AboutJoinContactSite MapLegalLinks

MembersPublic ResourcesSpecialist GroupsHealthcare Professionals

Academic Dermatology

Competency Assessments
Medical Students
Careers in UK Dermatology
Undergraduate Education
Higher Specialist Training
Primary Care Dermatology
Clinical Guidelines
Service Provision Guidelines
Fellowships
Meetings
Annual Meeting
NCCGs
Courses
Official Responses
GPWSI

Patient Information & Leaflets

Guidelines

BAD Biological Interventions Register

British Skin Foundation

BAD Media Section

History of British Dermatology

Members' Discussion Forum

BAD Members' Help Section

Do you plan to get a natural tan this summer? (qu. for public only, not medical professionals please)

View Results


>> Competency Assessments

From the BAD Education Sub-Committee/SAC Joint Assessment Board 

This page contains important information about new methods of assessment for trainees in Dermatology.

These new methods are designed to measure objectively a trainee’s performance in a simple, fair and reproducible fashion. They will improve the documentation reviewed at the annual ‘RITA’. This will improve the validity of this process and hopefully speed it up as well.

Why are these changes happening?

The current system for evaluating a trainee’s progress does not give sufficient detailed objective structured information that can be reviewed at the annual RITA. The majority of training programmes may make up for this by their own informal verbal or brief written evaluation, but this lack of clear documentation is no longer acceptable in today’s medical climate. More detailed written, objective testaments to a trainee’s competence are needed (not simply evidence that they have turned up to clinics for the last 6 months). Chairs of the STCs can then rely on proper evidence when signing trainees off at the end of the programme. The new PMETB will require the implementation of assessment and the JCHMT feels these methods will satisfy the new board.

What methods have been chosen and why?

The three new methods of assessment which are to be introduced are the Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini CEX), Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPS), and Multisource Feedback (MSF), previously called 360 degree assessments. Details of these are enclosed. These methods have been extensively piloted in medicine in the UK by the JCHMT, and the results of the pilot demonstrate good reproducibility. These results will be published in a medical journal soon. Pilots have also taken place in Dermatology in the UK and we have held 2 training days at the BAD to gain feedback from programme directors and STC chairs .

A fourth method (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire) is currently being piloted by the JCHMT.

How will implementation of these new methods take place?

This letter and information pack is being sent to all Training Programme Directors, STC chairs and Dermatology trainees in the UK. Each region will need to decide how best to introduce the new methods in their programme. It is important that all educational supervisors and trainees are familiar with the new methods. It has been suggested that each region holds a training day for all concerned. The local Deanery may also provide help in training for educational supervisors who will be performing the assessments.

These assessments will inform the RITA panel at the annual review along with the current documentation already compiled in the training record (ie they will be summative as well as formative).

Guidance on implementation of the assessments, including an educational video, and all of the necessary documentation is available on the JCHMT website at: http://www.jchmt.org.uk/assessment/performanceAssessment.asp
DOPS and MSF were introduced in October 2005 and it is planned to introduce Mini-CEX assessments in October 2006.

What forms should be used?

Now that the JCHMT has produced its own documentation, including assessment forms, these should be used in preference to those previously produced by the BAD. To gain access to these documents on the JCHMT website please visit: http://www.jchmt.org.uk/assessment/performanceAssessmentDocs.asp

The JCHMT documentation provides useful summaries of the assessments for the RITA interview.

Knowledge-Based Assessment

For information on the Knowledge-Based Assessment pilot held on 27 April 2006 please visit: http://www.jchmt.org.uk/assessment/kbapilot_dermat.asp

What next?

After one year of experience with the new methods, the BAD plans to hold another meeting to gain feedback from the training committees. It may well prove necessary to make some adjustments to our implementation of the assessment methods at that time. This meeting should also ensure that the methods are being implemented in a uniform fashion throughout the country. In conjunction with the SAC we aim to review the results of assessment after the first year.

If you require any further information please contact Kasia Kmieckowiak at BAD House either by phone on 020 7391 6348 or by email kasia@bad.org.uk  

Please click on the links below to obtain the relevant guidance. All of the necessary forms can be downloaded from the JCHMT website at: http://www.jchmt.org.uk/assessment/performanceAssessmentDocs.asp

Mini-CEX

Guidance
Guidance summary

DOPS

Guidance
Guidance summary

Multisource Feedback (MSF)

Guidance
Guidance summary

Guidance for assessors

Members
Login:
Password:
Skin Cancer Advice and Info
Academic Dermatology
Looking After Your Skin
BAD Annual Meeting Liverpool
Psoriasis from Gene to Clinic
National Library for Health Skin Disorders Library
 
about | join | contact | site map | legal | links
members | public resources | specialist groups | healthcare professionals
 
site designed by ludwood interactive